Bending the Curve of Global Freshwater Biodiversity Loss: An Emergency Recovery Plan

February 19, 2020

Julian Olden, a UW professor of aquatic and fishery studies, is a member of a global working group that aims to reverse the rapid worldwide decline in freshwater ecosystem biodiversity by advising international agreements. 

Despite their limited spatial extent, freshwater ecosystems host remarkable biodiversity, including one-third of all vertebrate species. This biodiversity is declining dramatically: Globally, wetlands are vanishing three times faster than forests, and freshwater vertebrate populations have fallen more than twice as steeply as terrestrial or marine populations. Threats to freshwater biodiversity are well documented but coordinated action to reverse the decline is lacking. We present an Emergency Recovery Plan to bend the curve of freshwater biodiversity loss. Priority actions include accelerating implementation of environmental flows; improving water quality; protecting and restoring critical habitats; managing the exploitation of freshwater ecosystem resources, especially species and riverine aggregates; preventing and controlling nonnative species invasions; and safeguarding and restoring river connectivity. We recommend adjustments to targets and indicators for the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Sustainable Development Goals and roles for national and international state and nonstate actors.

Humans have caused widespread planetary change, ushering in a new geological era, the Anthropocene (a term first coined in the 1980s by Eugene F. Stoermer, a freshwater biologist). Among many consequences, biodiversity has declined to the extent that we are witnessing a sixth mass extinction. Recent discourse has emphasized the triple challenge of bending the curve of biodiversity loss while also reducing climate change risks and improving lives for a growing human population. In 2020, governments will review international agreements relevant to this challenge, including the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). There is a brief window of opportunity now to set out recommendations that can inform these agreements and guide future policy responses.

Nowhere is the biodiversity crisis more acute than in freshwater ecosystems. Rivers, lakes, and inland wetlands (such as deltas, peatlands, swamps, fens, and springs) are home to an extraordinary diversity of life. Covering less than 1% of Earth’s surface, these habitats host approximately one-third of vertebrate species and 10% of all species, including an estimated 70 species of freshwater-adapted mammals, 5700 dragonflies, 250 turtles, 700 birds, 17,800 fishes, and 1600 crabs. The levels of endemism among freshwater species are remarkably high. For instance, of the fish species assessed for the freshwater ecoregions of the world, over half were confined to a single ecoregion.

Freshwater ecosystems also provide services to billions of people, including impoverished and vulnerable communities. However, the management of freshwater ecosystems worldwide has frequently prioritized a narrow range of services for macroeconomic benefit at the expense of habitats, flora and fauna, and the diverse benefits they provide to communities. Consequently, the current rate of wetland loss is three times that of forest loss, and populations of freshwater vertebrate species have fallen at more than twice the rate of land or ocean vertebrates. Of the 29,500 freshwater dependent species so far assessed for the IUCN Red List, 27% are threatened with extinction. Among these, an estimated 62% of turtle species, 47% of gastropods, 42% of mammals, 33% of amphibians, 30% of decapod crustaceans (crabs, crayfish, and shrimps), 28% of fishes, and 20% of birds are at risk. Populations of freshwater megafauna, defined as animals that reach a body mass of 30 kilograms, declined by 88% from 1970 to 2012, with the highest declines in the Indomalaya and Palearctic realms (−99% and −97%, respectively).

The causes of these declines have been comprehensively synthesized, but no global framework exists to guide policy responses commensurate with the scale and urgency of the situation, and actions to safeguard freshwater biodiversity have been “grossly inadequate”. Recommendations to address immediate threats to and underlying drivers of global biodiversity loss have focused mainly on terrestrial ecosystems, such as forests and grasslands or have emphasized particular conservation strategies, such as enhancing protected area coverage and condition. Although they are valuable, these proposals have either assumed, simplistically, that measures designed to improve land management will inevitably benefit freshwater ecosystems, or they have neglected to consider freshwater biodiversity at all. Anthropogenic threats distinct to freshwater ecosystems, especially those linked to hydrological regimes and loss of connectivity, have been insufficiently considered in international conservation agreements and conventional conservation strategies, impeding investment in appropriate policy and management measures and contributing inadvertently to the disproportionately high losses of freshwater species and habitats.

In this article, we present an Emergency Recovery Plan to reverse the rapid worldwide decline in freshwater biodiversity. This plan extends the concept of species recovery plans established in legislation such as the US Endangered Species Act 1973 and the Australian Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. Given the speed and extent of collapse in freshwater biodiversity, parallels can be drawn with postdisaster recovery situations, and we have deliberately used the word emergency to convey the urgency with which conservationists, water managers, stakeholders, and policymakers must act to avoid further deterioration of habitats and to promote recovery of biodiversity. The plan is novel in this conceptual foundation, in its focus on solutions (rather than documentation of threats) and in its explicit recommendations for international agreements, especially the CBD and the SDGs.


Waterhackweek 2020 Community Mixer – POSTPONED

NOTICE: Waterhackweek 2020 has been rescheduled to August 31-September 4, 2020, because of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak. As of April 9, 2020, all Waterhackweek 2020 programming has been moved entirely online, so the Community Mixer will not take place in its original format.

You’re Invited!

Join Waterhackweek participants, industry professionals and the greater University of Washington Freshwater Initiative and eScience Institute community for the Waterhackweek Community Mixer on Thursday, March 26, 2020, 4:00-6:30 pm at the Intellectual House. Waterhackweek, a 5-day collaborative workshop hosted by the UW Freshwater Initiative and eScience Institute, brings together water and data scientists from around the world.

Gregory R. Miller, Vice Dean of the UW College of Engineering, will give the welcome address!

Our keynote speaker is Lisa J. Graumlich! She will share her experiences translating research into impact as Dean of the UW College of the Environment.

The Community Mixer will also feature an informal poster session. All guests, including Waterhackweek participants and members of the local freshwater and data science communities, are invited to bring a physical or electronic representation of their work to inspire discussions and connections at the event. Community Mixer attendees are also invited to present a lightning talk about their work!

RSVP


Burning our bridges? Network analysis reveals trends in freshwater expertise

By Lauren Kuehne

January 8, 2020

As scientists, when we think about conservation problems, it’s often in terms of missing information – “knowledge gaps”, anyone? But the role of expertise – implying not only growth but also continuity in development and application of knowledge – is invariably less emphasized. This may be in part simply due to the tradition of science where knowledge and concepts are built incrementally – think Thomas Kuhn’s notion of normal science. However, it also can stem from more prosaic problems of maintaining research focus in the overburdened, underfunded world of environmental science.

In a new paper just out in BioScience, the Freshwater Ecology Conservation Lab examined expertise in a conservation area close to our hearts, which is assessment of freshwater ecosystems. This new paper follows up on a review published in 2016, in which we examined the way that ecological integrity of freshwater ecosystems have been assessed since passage of the 1972 Clean Water Act. In that review, we found that although methods have been becoming more standardized, there was a disheartening disconnect between assessment and management or policy-making.

Network graphs - then and now
Computational power to analyze networks has changed since the first “sociograms” were developed by psychiatrist J. L. Moreno in 1934 (right), to creating partial maps of the internet circa 2005 (left), but the basic concept of evaluating the strength and direction of relationships between individuals or organizations remains the same.

This finding spurred us to follow up by examining the position and role of expertise in freshwater assessment through time. We sought to answer the question: Which entities and individuals contribute most to this body of knowledge, and how are they collaborating with each other across organizational and ecosystem boundaries? Our goal was to assess the state of expertise – or “human capital” – related to freshwater assessment, expertise that is needed for everything from development of methods to participation in legislative and administrative reforms related to the Clean Water Act.

We used network analysis – a technique first formalized in the 1930s and used frequently in the social sciences – to analyze relationships between authors of grey and peer-reviewed publications related to freshwater assessment. Authors were categorized by their organizational affiliations – i.e., academic, federal government, NGO, etc – allowing us to analyze the frequency of collaborations both within and between organizational types. In network analysis, these are known as bonding (within) and bridging (between) ties, and are good indicators of strong relationships, regular paths of communication, and ability/propensity to collaborate. We also looked at cross-ecosystem exchange by examining ties between research groups working in different types of freshwater systems.

What we found was surprising. By the numbers, academic authors outweigh other groups, but when we looked at centralities – meaning the frequency that authors were connected to and formed a bridge between others – it was authors affiliated with federal agencies that were involved in the largest number of bonding and bridging ties. Authors affiliated with state government, NGOs, and consulting companies also held comparable importance in the network, depending on the type of centrality; for example, despite relatively low numbers, state agency affiliated authors were as prominent in the core network as those associated with universities. And although agencies like the US EPA might be expected in the core network, agencies that were less expected to be playing a role in such assessments, such as the National Park Service and Bureau of Land Management, were also well represented.

Network Graph - freshwater assessment
Network graph of individuals with expertise in assessment of fresh waters since passage of the 1972 Clean Water Act. The network is diverse, but highly fragmented, and with little evidence of increasing connectivity over time, making it vulnerable to loss of key individuals or organizations.

Diversity of the entities contributing to and sustaining expertise and knowledge exchange should be celebrated, but it must also be considered in light of the fact the network as a whole was highly fragmented, with little evidence of becoming less fragmented over time. This means that the network is only tenuously connected, and therefore highly vulnerable to loss of key individuals or groups, which can easily occur due to extended losses in funding or government shutdowns.

Given the war on science and scientists associated with the federal government during the last three years, it seems like a bad punchline to publish research that says those same scientists are the current mainstay of freshwater assessment knowledge and expertise. And although our analysis focused on freshwater assessment, research in other areas of ecology and conservation supports a similarly central role of government agencies in sustaining and building collaboration networks. Conservation science needs information, but we also need expertise and continuity; our goal with this paper was to establish where this expertise currently resides, and where it may need to be fostered and protected in the future. We hope that this study will spur important conversations about the value of knowledge networks in the years to come.

This article was originally published by the Freshwater Ecology Conservation Lab. 


EarthLab Lunch & Learn: Collaborating Across Difference

EarthLab Lunch & Learn Series: Collaborating Across Difference

Join EarthLab for lunch and conversation about the skills needed to collaborate across diverse fields and communities.

Co-sponsored by: Center for Global Studies, JSIS, Center for Health and the Global Environment, Urban@UW, Washington Sea Grant, William D. Ruckelshaus Center

Every month, two or more individuals from different backgrounds will share lessons from their collaborative relationship. Such partnerships might include artists collaborating with scientists, researchers collaborating with community members, academics collaborating with practitioners, and researchers collaborating across wide disciplinary divides, such as the sciences and humanities. Speakers will reflect on challenges and opportunities in their collaboration, specific awareness and skills they have developed in order to collaborate, and recommendations for others attempting similar feats. Each event will last two hours. The first hour will consist of a 20-30 minute panel discussion followed by audience Q&A and socializing. The second hour will be an opportunity for students to meet with the panelists and learn from those who are a few steps ahead about how to become collaborative boundary-crossers. We are kicking off the series December 10th with a member of the EarthLab community. We hope to see you there!

December 10th: A Generosity of Spirit: Bridging academic and management norms to create the Social Science for the Salish Sea research agenda

When: Tuesday, December 10 | 12:30-2:30 p.m.
Where: Fisheries (FSH) 106

Presented by Sara Jo Breslow, Social Science Lead for EarthLab and Leah Kintner, Ecosystem Recovery Manager for the Puget Sound Partnership.

In the past year, the Social Science for the Salish Sea project convened 40 researchers and practitioners from academic, governmental, non-profit and Indigenous organizations in Washington and British Columbia to scope an action-oriented research agenda to inform ecosystem recovery of our region. The project connected researchers and practitioners with different national, cultural, institutional and disciplinary backgrounds as well as different specialized languages, epistemologies, areas of interest, and workplace norms. Coming together to communicate and agree on a collective research agenda required time, patience, flexibility, expansive thinking, and a generosity of spirit. As co-leads, Breslow and Kintner had many conversations where they grappled with different expectations for the project as an academic and a practitioner. Where academics tend to prioritize new ideas, accuracy, and nuance, practitioners are often required to prioritize mandates, timeliness, and ease of communication. They had to find a balance, deciding what they were willing to forego in order to keep working on the project together while also learning that they both contributed expertise and original ideas as well as grappled in practical ways with real-world problems. Breslow and Kintner worked through their differences in order to facilitate the crafting of a research agenda that could both reflect academic and practitioner priorities and leverage support for environmental social science in the region.

Lunch & Learn RSVP


Physical Scientist at UW Climate Impacts Group

The Climate Impacts Group (CIG) at the University of Washington is hiring! Keep your eyes peeled for multiple opportunities to join our team in the coming weeks and months.

Our first need is for a physical scientist to join our team of professional researchers devoted to use-inspired research. We are looking for a person with strong technical skills in manipulating climate model data, interpreting hydrological and meteorological data, and physical process modelling. This position is intended to support the CIG’s senior research staff in work coproduced with our local, state, federal and tribal partners. The CIG is a fast-paced, dynamic, and deadline driven environment, which requires the research scientist to bring strong organizational and project management skills as well as problem-solving and priority-setting abilities.

While we are open to applicants with at least 2 years of experience and a B.S. in computer science, mathematics, engineering, earth sciences or a related field, we would prefer a candidate with more experience (Master’s or PhD). This is a full-time staff scientist research position with no teaching expectations and no path to University tenure. For more details and to apply, go to this link.

Contact: Jason Vogel, jmvogel@uw.edu


Announcing the Future Rivers NRT, a new student program focused on sustaining freshwater services

With essential freshwater ecosystems changing around the world, more interdisciplinary trained scientists are needed to think outside-the-box regarding these changes to help better sustain important resources. To address this need, the University of Washington has been awarded an NSF Research Traineeship grant to initiate an innovative graduate training model. Starting fall of 2020, both M.S. and PhD students will have the opportunity to receive innovative training in data analysis, cultural awareness, science communication, and participate in new interdisciplinary research.

The National Science Foundation Research Traineeship (NRT) award to the University of Washington will develop an innovative, culturally aware STEM trained workforce in freshwater science. Named Future Rivers, this program will prepare Trainees to become fluent in 21st century data science approaches to understand interactions among and within food, water, and energy sectors in order to expand the options for environmental sustainability. Students will learn to work in applied ways within career fields outside of academia to create a solid foundation that connects academic government and industry partners when addressing freshwater issues.

Learn More

Originally published by EarthLab


Fall Freshwater Mixer

Socialize with freshwater colleagues and learn about a unique educational opportunity in interdisciplinary freshwater research.

With the world’s population growing rapidly, the upcoming Future Rivers NRT will provide students with the skillset and experience to sustain food-energy-water services in freshwater ecosystems. Join us for a social event to earn more about the NRT from SAFS professor Gordon Holtgrieve and connect with members of the UW freshwater research community! We’re also pleased to welcome special guest Brian Eyler, who will discuss his new book, “The Last Days of the Mighty Mekong.” Light refreshments and drinks will be provided.

When: Tuesday, October 22, 2019, 4:00 p.m.

Where: Fishery Sciences Building Lobby (FSH) 1122 NE Boat St, Seattle, WA 98105

Who: Students, faculty, staff, and friends of UW — all are welcome!


SPECIAL GUEST:Headshot of Brian Eyler, director of the Stimson Center Southeast Asia program Brian Eyler, Director, Stimson Center Southeast Asia Program

Brian Eyler is an expert on transboundary issues in the Mekong region and specializes in China’s economic cooperation with Southeast Asia. His new book, “The Last Days of the Mighty Mekong,” takes the reader on a journey from glaciers in China to rice fields in Vietnam, stopping along the way in Cambodia, Laos, and Thailand.


Hydrology/Fisheries Faculty Position at Salish Kootenai College (Pablo, MT)

Work for the only Hydrology Bachelor’s degree program at a Tribal College or University!

Salish Kootenai College Department of Hydrology is seeking a full time hydrology instructor with fisheries experience in applied hydrological measurements, fluvial processes, general fisheries biology and hydrological and fisheries management tools for natural and cultural resource management for tribal organizations.

The minimum requirements will be an M.S. (PhD preferred) in Hydrology, Fisheries, Geoscience, or closely related degree.

Apply on the Salish Kootenai College website.

Contact: Dr. Antony Berthelote

Hydrology Department Head

(406) 275-4080

antony_berthelote@skc.edu

Additional Information